LIVE AT GATHER AI: GTM SYSTEMS IN PRODUCTION

GTM Engineering, Not Another Tool

The tools aren't the problem. The connections between them are. I build those.

WHERE IT BREAKS

What's costing you pipeline?

01

Reps are guessing who to call

Outbound and account prioritization built on research your reps shouldn't have to do manually: who to call, why, and who else is in the room.

02

Nobody knows why deals are actually lost

Call intelligence pulled straight from Gong: which objections come up, which ones get answered well, and which ones quietly kill deals.

03

Leads sit in limbo between marketing and sales

Scoring and routing built on real deal data, not a workshop guess, so a lead's quality isn't a debate every time one shows up.

04

Your GTM knowledge lives in someone's head

Analyses, reports, and findings that would otherwise get buried in a Slack thread, put somewhere your team can actually find them again.

05

Expansion revenue gets missed

Whitespace inside your existing customer base, surfaced before a competitor finds it first.

06

The stack doesn't talk to itself

Whatever the specific gap, the pattern's the same: extract what's already there, connect the systems that don't talk, ship it somewhere your team actually uses it.

WHAT'S ACTUALLY RUNNING

Proof

Four systems, live at Gather AI. Hover a card, or tap it on mobile, for the full build.

ORCHESTRATION
Apollo Pipeline Orchestrator

Reps wake up to their day's work, already reviewed.

SUMMARY

Three scheduled jobs, morning driver, response watcher, weekly digest, that pick accounts, research them, find contacts, write personalized outreach, and stage it in Apollo for human review.

PROBLEM

Reps were manually deciding which accounts to work each day and drafting outreach from scratch, eating into actual selling time.

SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

A two-axis Fit + Signal scoring engine assigns each account a verdict: STRIKE, NURTURE, QUALIFY, or KILL. The morning job pulls the highest-priority accounts, a research agent builds context per account, a drafting agent writes personalized content, and everything stages in Apollo for a human to review and send. A response-watcher job tracks replies; a weekly digest reports pipeline health.

END STATE

Live and running daily. AEs review pre-drafted, prioritized outreach every morning instead of building it from scratch. The system never sends without human confirmation.

ENRICHMENT
Account-to-Outbound Pipeline

Your reps show up and the work is already done.

SUMMARY

An AI-driven pipeline that finds ICP accounts, identifies the buying committee, enriches contacts, and produces a reasoned SDR account plan automatically, at scale.

PROBLEM

SDRs spent 2 to 3 hours per account on manual research before they could even start outreach, with inconsistent coverage across verticals.

SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

Programmatic ICP account discovery across 5 verticals feeds an AI research layer that identifies the actual buying party per account. A separate enrichment step fills in verified contact data, with a zero-result remediation loop that re-attempts "dead" accounts instead of dropping them. Output is a structured account plan, not just a contact list.

END STATE

11,000 accounts enriched, 93.9% verified contacts. Zero-result remediation recovered 23 of 64 initially dead accounts, adding 246 contacts.

CALL INTELLIGENCE
Gong Call Intelligence Pipeline

Know why you lost the deal before the rep logs it.

SUMMARY

Bulk extraction and analysis of sales call transcripts to answer what buyers actually object to, and which answers lead to closed-won.

PROBLEM

Objection handling varied rep to rep with no data behind it, and leadership had no way to know why deals were really being lost beyond anecdote.

SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

Built a custom extraction pipeline against Gong's POST-only API, since there's no native bulk export, to pull 300+ call transcripts. Classified discovery questions and objections across 318 calls, tagging 1,139 rep questions by type and outcome, then cross-referenced against closed-won and closed-lost data.

END STATE

90.8% of buyer pains raised in calls went unprobed by reps, a fact leadership didn't have access to before, replacing anecdote with a callable answer.

LEAD SCORING
Clay + HubSpot Lead Scoring

No more arguing about whether a lead is any good.

SUMMARY

A lead scoring and routing system that replaces a workshop-built MQL definition with one backed by actual revenue data.

PROBLEM

Sales didn't trust marketing's leads, marketing couldn't prove lead quality, and there was no shared definition of "qualified."

SOLUTION ARCHITECTURE

Clay handles the data layer, enrichment across 11 fields per lead. HubSpot runs the scoring logic, a formula-driven 0 to 100 ICP score with A/B/C/D tiering, built from patterns in past deals rather than assumption. Separation of concerns means data sources can be swapped without touching the scoring model.

END STATE

Every lead is scored before a rep sees it, against criteria tied to what's actually closed before. No more "is this lead any good" argument between teams.

WHAT WE'RE HEARING

What buyers actually say

Pulled from real conversations at Gather AI, not generic pain-point copy.

My AEs own a full book of accounts and now have to do their own outbound: researching, finding contacts, writing messaging, on top of actually selling.
→ ACCOUNT-TO-OUTBOUND PIPELINE
We don't know which objections actually kill deals with which type of buyer. We're guessing at messaging instead of knowing.
→ GONG CALL INTELLIGENCE PIPELINE
Every rep handles objections differently, and nobody's checked which answers actually lead to closed-won.
→ GONG CALL INTELLIGENCE PIPELINE
I want to know what VPs of Ops push back on most, and the only way to find out is listening to hundreds of calls myself.
→ "ASK YOUR GONG CALLS" APP
The alternative is a $90K RevOps hire and six months of hoping they figure it out.
WHO'S BUILDING THIS

The guide, not the hero

I'm a GTM Engineer at Gather AI. My approach is simple: extract the intelligence already sitting in your tools, connect it across systems that don't talk to each other, and ship it to the people who need it.

Now I build the same kind of systems for Series B/C GTM teams living the same problem.

TRANSPARENCYEverything below is live at one company: Gather AI, where I'm the GTM Engineer. No client roster, no agency case studies. These are systems I built, shipped, and run myself. The diagnostic exists to prove they transfer to your stack, not just mine.
90.8%
of buyer pains went unprobed
GONG CALL INTELLIGENCE
11,000 / 93.9%
accounts enriched, verified
ACCOUNT-TO-OUTBOUND PIPELINE
Live
in daily use by AEs
APOLLO PIPELINE ORCHESTRATOR
HOW IT WORKS

Three steps. No pricing games.

Structure is fixed. Price is disclosed in the diagnostic, not before it.

01 / DIAGNOSTIC · 1–2 WEEKS

I map your stack

I map your stack and pipeline, then tell you exactly what's broken and what to build.

02 / BUILD · 4–12 WEEKS

I build it

You keep everything: the system runs on your stack, not a platform you rent from me. Timeline depends on scope, set in the diagnostic.

03 / RETAINER · ONGOING

I tune it

As your team and stack change, the system gets tuned to keep up. Optional, month to month.

If your reps don't tell me it saves them 30 minutes a day within the first week, you don't pay the final invoice.
You keep the ICP report regardless. And if the diagnostic shows this isn't a fit, you keep the findings and walk away. No build, no obligation.
QUESTIONS

FAQ

What does Xavier Singletary do?
Builds GTM engineering systems for Series B/C sales and marketing teams, connecting Gong, Salesforce, Clay, HubSpot, and enrichment tools into one pipeline that tells reps who to call and why, every morning.
How is this different from hiring a RevOps person or buying more tools?
No new tools, no new hires. The system runs on the stack you already pay for and ships intelligence to reps directly, instead of adding another dashboard to check.
How much does it cost?
Pricing depends on scope. It's set in the diagnostic, not before it. The structure is fixed: a paid diagnostic first, then a flat-fee build, then an optional monthly retainer to tune it.
ASK ANY AI ABOUT ME

The alternative is a $90K RevOps hire and a 6-month wait to find out if it works.

The diagnostic tells you exactly what to build first, and what it transfers to your stack, not just mine.

Book the diagnostic